The first and most important part of non-suicide contracts is the clear agreement that the person signing the contract will not die by suicide. Next, the next section lists the names and phone numbers a person should call if they become suicidal. The awarding of safety contracts may also restore a sense of control in the suicidal patient, who may otherwise feel a lack of control.3 The patient may remember that he or she is ultimately responsible for the decision to attempt suicide and that the conclusion of the contract involves the identification of a support system available to the patient if he or she does not feel able to do so. to maintain control. The security contract can be used as a safety plan, including alerting hospital staff or making an outpatient contact with a therapist. Anyone who has been suicidal (or potentially) should sign a non-suicide contract with their doctor and family or friends. Research on the effectiveness of contracting for youth safety in reducing the risk of suicide is minimal. Early literature suggests that the use of a non-suicide contract with adolescents at low or medium risk of suicide is an effective strategy, but empirical evidence is not cited to support the recommendation24. whose privileges are related to compliance with a written non-suicide agreement. Patients indicated that the agreement had helped them change their suicidal behaviour, but were only moderately interested in pursuing the agreement after their release.25 Finally, make sure that the non-suicide contract is kept safe and easy to find.
So if the person who signed it becomes suicidal, they will find it easily. The initial purpose of the suicide-free contract was to serve as an evaluation tool and its continued use for this purpose can provide valuable information about the suicidal patient. Whether a patient is willing to participate in such a contract can guide risk assessment and the patient`s attitude towards the agreement can also provide useful information.6 Refusal of a security contract can provide the most valuable clinical information, eliminate a mistaken sense of security and encourage measures to ensure patient safety.4 .5.7 Questions were asked about the ability of suicidal patients. to accept a non-suicide contract. The presence of such obstacles, such as poisoning, active psychosis, severe depression or intense despair and rapid movement within the Alliance due to personality disorders were identified as potential challenges and were thought to disrupt a patient`s ability to accept such an agreement.6 Contracting with these individuals would not be legally valid given the criteria described by Simon7 in 1999. stipulating that a contract must involve the legally competent parties.